R. Kelly Reportedly Slammed His Former Legal Team For Selecting Jurors Who Saw “Surviving R. Kelly”

Write Comment

R. Kelly Reportedly Slammed His Former Legal Team For Selecting Jurors Who Saw “Surviving R. Kelly”

Looks like R. Kelly had some words for his former legal team in a recently filed statement for allegedly picking numerous jurors who “may” have seen Surviving R. Kelly. The documentary series that presented the long history of abuse allegations that have been made against the R&B singer.

UNSPECIFIED LOCATION – MARCH 6: (EDITORS NOTE: Best quality available) In this handout provided by Cook County Sheriff’s Office, R. Kelly poses for a mugshot photo after being arrested for $161,663 in unpaid child support March 6, 2019. The Cook County Sheriff’s Office revealed that Kelly will have to pay the full amount before he can be released from jail. (Photo by Cook County Sheriff’s Office via Getty Images)

RELATED:Jailed Singer R. Kelly Reportedly Contracts COVID-19 — Needs More Time To File Appeal As Diagnosis Has Hampered His Ability To Speak

“At certain points during jury selection, I did hear that some jurors may have seen the Surviving R. Kelly docuseries and that concerned me greatly,” Kelly wrote, according to the New York Daily News. “I raised my concerns with my attorneys but they shooed me off. I was nothing more than a bystander in the process. … There was no strategy involved in choosing the jurors that sat on my jury as far as I could tell. At least there was no trial strategy that involved my input.”

Kelly got rid of his previous legal team and hired a new lawyer, Jennifer Bonjean, who argues his client was never provided a fair trial because of the release of Surviving R. Kelly.

RELATED:R. Kelly Placed On Suicide Watch Following His Racketeering Conviction

R. Kelly Jailhouse Beatdown: Lawyers Claim Guards Never Raised A Finger, Suggest Attack Was Encouraged
CHICAGO, IL – SEPTEMBER 17: Singer R. Kelly appears during a hearing at the Leighton Criminal Courthouse on September 17, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois. Kelly is facing multiple sexual assault charges and is being held without bail. (Photo by Antonio Perez – Pool via Getty Images)

“Because defendant was forced to defend against dozens of uncharged claims of abusive and sexual misbehavior—much of it lawful albeit unpalatable for some—defendant was stripped of the presumption of innocence and denied a fair trial,” Bonjean explained in a court memo last month. “But that is not all, Defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorneys failed to file adequate pre-trial objections to the introduction of the mass of overly prejudicial propensity evidence and routinely failed to lodge timely objections to some (although not all) of the damning bad-act evidence.”

Kelly’s sentencing is planned to take place on May 4. He faces a maximum of life in prison.

Leave a Comment