Megan Thee Stallion lost her bid to block Milgaro Gramz, born Milagro Elizabeth Cooper, from continuing to speak about her after the Houston Hottie sued the blogger for defamation and won.
As we previously shared, Megan, born Megan Pete, first filed her defamation lawsuit in October 2024. She alleged Cooper was the “mouthpiece,” “puppet,” and “paid surrogate” for rapper Tory Lanez — whom Megan named as the gunman in her 2020 shooting.
In December 2022, a jury convicted the Toronto rapper in the shooting on July 15, 2020. In August 2023, a judge sentenced him to 10 years in prison. Lanez, born Daystar Peterson, was found guilty of three felonies: assault with a semiautomatic firearm; having a loaded, unregistered firearm in a vehicle; and discharging a firearm with gross negligence.
Furthermore, in Megan’s lawsuit, she accused Cooper of participating in a targeted and coordinated social media campaign to intimidate, harass, and defame the “Savage” rapper. The suit further accused Cooper of spreading falsehoods about Megan to punish and attempt to discredit her after publicly naming Lanez as her shooter. Megan accused Cooper of trolling her online and spreading knowingly harmful content about her — including a sexually explicit deepfake video of Megan that was circulating online.
Jury Finds Milagro Gramz Liable Of Defamation In Megan Thee Stallion Lawsuit
In December 2025, a federal jury in Florida found Cooper liable of defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and promoting a deepfake video of the rapper. The jury also awarded the rapper $75,000 in damages. However, a day later, Judge Cecila M. Altonaga, entered a final judgment dismissing the defamation claim, as the jury listed Cooper as a “media defendant.” The judge also dropped Cooper’s damages owed to $59,000.
Taking to her X account, Cooper wrote, “Defamation is a wash.” Before that, she shared a statement from her attorneys, which read:
“After we released our official statement yesterday, @quinnemanuel (Megan’s attorneys) emailed Jeremy in an attempt to intimidate and threaten the Defense team to retract its statement.
@quinnemanuel continued by releasing its own statement falsely accusing the Defense of making false and defamatory statements. Some, but not all, of the ‘Independent Journalists’ who were present during the trial aligned themselves with Megan’s attorneys and promoted the false narrative that the Defense team was somehow lying about the results of the trial.
Megan herself took to Twitter and accused the Defense team of lying. Hours ago, Judge Altonaga reduced her oral ruling to writing and it is clear that the Defense never lied about the results of the trial. The Final Judgment of the Court is that the defamation claim is dismissed. Any headline that reads that Megan won her ‘Defamation Suit’ is thus inaccurate.
How ironic is it that Megan sued Milagro because Milagro called Megan a liar… Yet Megan and her attorneys make false accusations and accuse the Defense team of being liars.”
Judge Denies Megan Thee Stallion’s Permanent Cyberstalking Injunction Against Milagro Gramz Despite Jury Finding Blogger Liable Of Defamation
Since the December update, TMZ now reports that a judge has denied Megan’s request for a permanent injunction to block Cooper from speaking about her and cyberstalking. In court documents, the judge doesn’t believe the claims against Cooper automatically grant a cyberstalking injunction to block her from blogging about Megan any further.
Despite Megan alleging the harassment continued after winning her defamation case, the judge ruled there is no evidence proving Cooper ever tried to physically track down the rapper, attend her concerts, or directly contact her. These instances would meet the requirements for a cyberstalking injunction. The judge isn’t convinced Megan’s in danger, claiming she failed to prove any real, imminent threat, only a possibility.
Additionally, the judge said Megan already won in the law’s eyes after winning her lawsuit with money damages. Even though the judge has the power to offer additional relief, they haven’t found a reason to do so. Furthermore, the judge said that by granting Megan’s request to block Cooper from blogging about her would be an “impermissible prior restraint” on her First Amendment right, essentially violating her freedom of speech.
#Socialites, be sure to check out the post below, then leave us your thoughts in a comment after!