Are You Still Eating Subway? Lawsuit Reveals Tuna Contains Chicken, Pork & Cattle
Something’s real fishy at Subway, and it’s not the Tuna!
In the latest amended lawsuit against Subway and its fake Tuna reveals that lab testing shows that it allegedly contains animal proteins including chicken, pork and cattle, which is not 100% Tuna.
Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin filed a third version of their suit that accused Subway of lying about their 100% Tuna.
The complaint claims that Subway lies to customers “into buying premium-priced food dishes based on the representation that the tuna products contained only tuna and no other fish species, animal products, or miscellaneous ingredients.”
RELATED: Lab Tests Unable To Find Any Tuna Dna In Subway Sandwiches
“Subway tuna is high-quality, wild-caught, 100% tuna. The plaintiffs have filed three meritless complaints, changing their story each time. This third, most recent amended claim, was filed only after their prior complaint was rightfully dismissed by a federal judge,” a Subway rep said to Insider.
“Our legal team is in the process of evaluating the plaintiffs’ amended claim, and will once again file a new motion to dismiss this reckless and improper lawsuit. The fact remains that Subway tuna is real and strictly regulated by the FDA in the US, and other government entities around the world.”
DONT EAT THE TUNA FROM SUBWAY pic.twitter.com/kDOGeygVnq
— 𓅓 (@EgyptianSnack) November 5, 2021