Megan Thee Stallion and her attorneys are reportedly pushing to question Tory Lanez under oath while he is incarcerated. This request comes as part of a defamation and cyberstalking lawsuit that Megan has filed against social media blogger Milagro Cooper.
According to reporter Meghann Cuniff and TMZ, Megan’s attorneys have filed documents asking a judge for permission to take a deposition from Tory as part of their investigation into a defamation and cyberstalking case. As we’ve previously reported, Megan is suing blogger Milagro Cooper for allegedly launching an online campaign to spread false information about her following Tory’s conviction for shooting her.
According to the court documents, Tory is open to chatting with Megan’s lawyers—under oath, of course—since he’s not fighting the motion to be deposed. Now they just need the judge’s approval so they can set a date.
Analysis of Legal Strategies and Implications
The legal strategies employed in this case are as bold as they are complex. Megan Thee Stallion’s legal team is leaving no stone unturned as they push to question Tory Lanez under oath. This move is not just a routine legal procedure—it’s a tactical play aimed at unearthing potentially damning evidence that could reshape the narrative around the defamation and cyberstalking allegations. By requesting a deposition from Tory, Megan’s team aims to tap into details that may link him directly to the misinformation campaign led by Milagro Cooper.
One key element of the strategy is to dismantle any semblance of innocence that Tory might claim. The legal filings suggest that Tory’s willingness to speak under oath indicates a potential openness to revealing facts that could implicate him. This is significant because it contrasts with many high-profile cases where the defendant avoids answering probing questions. The deposition could bring to light communications, financial transactions, or other forms of support that Tory may have extended to Cooper. In doing so, it may establish a direct line of accountability, which is crucial in defamation cases.
Furthermore, the approach adopted by Megan’s legal team emphasizes the importance of transparency in legal proceedings. They argue that every detail matters—especially in a case where public reputation is at stake. The strategic use of a deposition not only aims to expose the truth but also serves as a deterrent to anyone considering engaging in similar actions. In an era where social media amplifies every rumor and allegation, the legal community is watching closely to see how this case will set a precedent for future defamation lawsuits.